Latest Articles

Are You Doing Problem Management or Just Pretending? — The Problem Management Maturity Model The Maturity Model Problem management maturity describes how advanced your problem management practice is. Low maturity means problems are treated as incidents, root cause analysis is superficial, and recurring issues persist. High maturity means problems are proactively identified, root causes are systematically eliminated, and incidents are prevented before they occur. Maturity Levels Level 1: Initial/Reactive Characteristics: Problems are treated as incidents No formal problem management process Root cause analysis is ad-hoc Recurring incidents are common No known error database When you need to improve: If you can't tell the difference between incidents and problems Level 2: Repeatable Characteristics: Problem records are created Basic categorization and prioritization Some root cause analysis is performed Some workarounds are documented Some integration with incident management When you need to improve: If root cause analysis is superficial Level 3: Defined Characteristics: Standardized problem management process Formal root cause analysis techniques Known error database is used Process metrics are tracked Regular problem reviews are conducted When you need to improve: If problems still recur after being "resolved" Level 4: Managed Characteristics: Proactive problem management is practiced Trend analysis identifies emerging issues Predictive analytics are used Process performance is measured Continuous improvement is systematic When you need to improve: If you're still surprised by incidents Level 5: Optimizing Characteristics: Problems are prevented before they occur Continuous learning and improvement AI and automation are used extensively Integration with other processes is seamless Business value is clearly demonstrated When you need to improve: When you're ready to lead Maturity Assessment Questions Area Question Process Do you have a formal problem management process? Knowledge Do you have a known error database? Proactivity Do you proactively identify problems? Techniques Do you use formal RCA techniques? Metrics Do you measure problem management effectiveness? Integration Is problem management integrated with other processes? Building a Roadmap Level 1 → Level 2: Create problem record types Train on problem vs. incident distinction Link incidents to problems Level 2 → Level 3: Implement RCA techniques Create known error database Standardize workflows Level 3 → Level 4: Implement trend analysis Start proactive problem management Track process metrics Level 4 → Level 5: Implement predictive analytics Automate problem detection Continuous learning Conclusion Problem management maturity is a journey. Organizations that assess their maturity and build a roadmap for improvement will achieve fewer incidents, higher service quality, and better business outcomes. Action Items for Your Organization Assess your current problem management maturity Identify gaps in your process Build a roadmap to the next level Measure progress over time Celebrate improvements

Stop Confusing Incidents and Problems — Why the Distinction Is the Foundation of Service Stability The Simple Rule Incidents are about restoring service; Problems are about preventing recurrence. This simple distinction is the foundation of effective service management. Yet many organizations fail to maintain the separation, leading to recurring issues and frustrated users. ITIL Definitions Incident: An unplanned interruption to an IT service or reduction in the quality of an IT service. Problem: The underlying cause of one or more incidents . Key Differences Dimension Incident Problem Purpose Restore service quickly Prevent recurrence  Reported by Customers/Users Internal IT members  Focus Symptom Root cause Resolution Workaround or fix Permanent elimination Timeline Immediate Can take months Priority Service impact Business impact and recurrence Why the Distinction Matters 1. Avoiding Recurrence If you only fix incidents and never investigate problems, the same issues will happen again and again. Incident management restores service; problem management prevents future disruptions. 2. Resource Allocation Incident management requires immediate attention; problem management can be planned. Without distinguishing between the two, urgent incidents can prevent strategic problem investigation. 3. Knowledge Management Known errors (problems with documented workarounds) enable faster incident resolution. Without problem management, this knowledge isn't captured. 4. Continuous Improvement Problem management drives improvement by identifying and eliminating systemic issues. When Does an Incident Become a Problem? An incident should become a problem when : A Major Incident has occurred A pattern of recurring Incidents suggests an underlying cause should be addressed An Event has occurred where an underlying cause should be addressed Real-World Example Incident: A server crashes. Teams restart the server, restoring service. Problem: Investigation reveals the server crashed because of a memory leak in the application. Problem resolution: The application is patched to fix the memory leak. Result: The incident doesn't recur. Common Mistakes Mistake Consequence Treating every incident as a problem Overwhelmed problem management team Never escalating incidents to problems Recurring issues never fixed Using the same process for both Problems treated as urgent fixes Not documenting known errors Same incident repeats Conclusion The distinction between incidents and problems is not academic—it's operational. Organizations that maintain this separation will have fewer recurring incidents, better knowledge management, and more stable services. Action Items for Your Organization Ensure your ITSM platform has separate Incident and Problem record types Train your team on the incident vs. problem distinction Create clear criteria for when an incident should become a problem Document known errors when problems are resolved Measure recurring incident rates Topic 11: Known Errors and Workarounds — The Knowledge Foundation of Problem Management Headline: When You Can't Fix It Permanently — How Known Errors and Workarounds Keep Services Running What Is a Known Error? When Problem Management identifies the underlying cause and develops a workaround, the problem becomes a "known error" . A known error is a problem that has been diagnosed and has a documented workaround. Key characteristics: Root cause is identified Workaround is documented May not be permanently fixed yet Knowledge is available for future incidents What Is a Workaround? A workaround is a temporary method for achieving the given task when the planned method is not working due to the Problem. The workaround is abandoned when the Problem is fixed . Workarounds help reduce service interruptions until the Problem is fully resolved . Characteristics of a good workaround: Restores service Is documented clearly Is easy to implement Is safe to use The Known Error Database (KEDB) Known Error articles are documented both in the Problem Record and as articles in the IT Service Management tool's Knowledge Base . The KEDB is the repository for known errors and their associated workarounds. It serves as a critical knowledge resource for incident management teams. What the KEDB contains: Problem description Root cause Symptoms Workarounds Resolution (if available) Related incidents Why Known Errors Matter Benefit Impact Faster resolution Incidents resolved using known workarounds Reduced downtime Services restored quickly Increased confidence Teams can resolve issues reliably Knowledge sharing Tribal knowledge is captured Better reporting Known errors inform trend analysis The Known Error Workflow Problem diagnosed: Root cause is identified Workaround identified: A temporary fix is developed Known error created: Documented in the KEDB Incidents linked: Related incidents associated with the known error Incident resolution: Agents use the workaround to restore service Problem resolution: Permanent fix is implemented Known error updated: Resolution is documented, workaround retired Creating Effective Known Error Articles Essential information: Problem description Symptoms Root cause Workaround steps Implementation considerations Related incidents Resolution (when implemented) Best practices: Use clear, plain language Include steps in chronological order Note any limitations of the workaround Keep articles current Link to related knowledge When Known Errors Are Most Valuable Known errors are particularly valuable for: Scenario Why High-volume incidents Same issue repeatedly resolved faster Complex systems Expert knowledge is captured and shared New team members Access to institutional knowledge Service desk triage First-line support can resolve more issues Conclusion Known errors and workarounds are the foundation of effective incident and problem management. By documenting known errors, organizations capture institutional knowledge, enable faster incident resolution, and build a learning culture. Action Items for Your Organization Establish a Known Error Database (KEDB) Create a template for known error articles Train teams on how to create and use known errors Link known errors to incident records Measure how often known errors are used in incident resolution

Headline: 56% of Organizations Use Common Controls Frameworks — Here's Why You Should Too The Audit Fatigue Problem Managing varying global regulations is one of the heaviest operational burdens that modern enterprises face. Replicating work across siloed standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF, and sector-specific rules creates unsustainable audit fatigue. The manual burden: 76% of GRC professionals still spend 30% or more of their working hours on repetitive, manual administrative tasks . What Is a Common Controls Framework? A Common Controls Framework (CCF) rationalizes overlapping standards by mapping a single control to multiple requirements simultaneously. This slashes manual administrative burdens by up to 33% compared to siloed or ad-hoc frameworks . Key finding: 56% of surveyed organizations utilize a common controls framework to rationalize overlapping standards, and 58% leverage software to continuously monitor controls . How a CCF Works Without a CCF: Standard Control Evidence ISO 27001 Access Control Evidence A NIST CSF Access Control Evidence B SOC 2 Access Control Evidence C With a CCF: Standard Control Evidence ISO 27001 Access Control Evidence A NIST CSF Access Control Evidence A SOC 2 Access Control Evidence A The benefit: One control, one set of evidence, many standards satisfied. Benefits of a Common Controls Framework Benefit Impact Reduced duplication One control satisfies multiple requirements Lower administrative burden Up to 33% reduction in manual work Consistent evidence Same evidence used for multiple audits Faster audits Less time preparing for each audit Better visibility Single view of control status Improved assurance Controls are designed once, tested once How to Implement a Common Controls Framework Step 1: Map Your Requirements List all standards you need to comply with Identify overlapping controls Document control requirements Step 2: Define Common Controls For each control area, define one control Map it to all applicable standards Document evidence requirements Step 3: Implement Monitoring Track control status continuously Collect evidence once, use for multiple audits Report on compliance across all standards Step 4: Maintain and Update Update controls as standards change Add new standards as needed Continuously improve Example: Access Control Requirements from multiple standards: ISO 27001 A.9.1.2: Access to networks and network services NIST CSF PR.AC-1: Identities and credentials are issued, managed, verified, revoked, and audited SOC 2 CC6.1: Logical access controls Common control: "Access to enterprise systems and data is restricted to authorized users through role-based access controls, with regular access reviews and documented exceptions." This one control satisfies all three requirements. The Technology Enabler CCFs work best with technology support. Key capabilities: Control mapping: Map a single control to multiple frameworks Evidence reuse: Use evidence across multiple audits Continuous monitoring: Track control status continuously Reporting: Generate compliance reports for any framework Conclusion A Common Controls Framework (CCF) is the most effective way to beat audit fatigue. Organizations that implement CCFs will reduce manual effort, improve consistency, and maintain audit readiness across multiple frameworks. Action Items for Your Organization Map all standards you need to comply with Identify overlapping controls Implement a Common Controls Framework Use software to monitor controls continuously Measure the reduction in manual effort  

From RCA to Remediation — How Problem Tasks Structure Your Problem Management Workflow What Are Problem Tasks? Problem tasks break down problem investigation and resolution into manageable, assignable units. They enable: Clear accountability for each part of the resolution Parallel work on different aspects of the problem Tracking of progress toward resolution The Role of Problem Tasks in the Workflow Problem tasks are the building blocks of problem resolution: Problem detected: The problem record is created Problem tasks created: Work is broken down into assignable tasks Tasks assigned: Each task is assigned to the appropriate team or individual Tasks completed: Each task is worked and completed Problem closure: All tasks complete, problem resolved Types of Problem Tasks Task Type Description Example Root cause analysis Investigate the underlying cause Complete 5 Whys analysis Investigation Gather data and evidence Collect logs from affected systems Remediation/Action Plan Develop the fix Create change request Verification Confirm the fix works Test the fix in staging Implementation Deploy the fix Apply the patch Documentation Document the resolution Update knowledge base Best Practices for Problem Tasks 1. Standardized Task Types Use consistent task types across problems This enables reporting on where effort is spent Makes it easier to identify bottlenecks 2. Clear Accountability Each task should have a clear owner The owner is responsible for completing the task No task should be left unassigned 3. Cross-Functional Assignment Different tasks may require different expertise Assign tasks to the appropriate team members Ensure no single person becomes a bottleneck 4. Dashboard Tracking Track open tasks, overdue tasks, and completion rates Use dashboards for visibility  The Problem Task Lifecycle Stage Description Created Task is created and assigned In Progress Work has started on the task Blocked Task cannot progress due to dependencies Completed Task work is complete Verified Task outcome is verified Governance Models Problem Manager owns the workflow: Overall accountability for problem resolution Technical SMEs update work notes: Technical details are captured accurately Regular reviews: Task status is reviewed regularly Scaling Across Multi-Regional Teams When problem management spans multiple regions: Use consistent task types Standardize documentation Clear handoff processes Timezone-aware assignment Conclusion Problem tasks provide the structure needed for effective problem resolution. By breaking down complex problems into manageable, assignable units, organizations can ensure systematic investigation and resolution. Action Items for Your Organization Define standard problem task types Create clear accountability for each task Implement dashboard tracking Establish governance models Measure task completion time  

Stop the Alert Noise — How AI-Powered Anomaly Detection Replaces Static Thresholds That Never Worked The Alert Fatigue Crisis One of the most persistent problems in incident management is alert fatigue. Teams drown in alerts that mean nothing, miss the ones that mean everything, and ultimately lose trust in their monitoring systems. The root cause: static thresholds. Static thresholds are fixed values that trigger alerts when exceeded. For example: "Alert when CPU usage exceeds 80%."

Every Major Incident Deserves a Major Problem Review — Here's How to Do It Right When to Conduct a Major Problem Review Team members should carry out in-depth reviews of major problems. When a Major Incident occurs, a problem should always be raised. After resolution, team members should carry out in-depth reviews of major problems. What a Major Problem Review Covers A major problem review should cover: What happened: The incident timeline and events Why it happened: Root cause analysis What worked: What went well in the response What could have been better: Areas for improvement What we learned: Key lessons and insights What we'll do differently: Action items and follow-up The Major Problem Review Process Step 1: Schedule Promptly Schedule the review within 5 business days of the incident. Quickness matters—details are fresher, and the incident is still top of mind. Step 2: Gather Participants Include: Incident Commander (if used) Technical responders Problem Manager Service owners Management (for significant incidents) Step 3: Prepare the Review Collect: Incident timeline Communications Actions taken Root cause analysis Resolution details Step 4: Conduct the Review Review the incident timeline Discuss the root cause Identify what worked well Identify areas for improvement Document action items Step 5: Follow Up Assign owners to action items Set due dates Track completion Share learnings Key Questions to Ask Area Questions Detection How was the incident detected? Could it have been detected faster? Response Was the response effective? What could have been better? Communication Were stakeholders informed appropriately? Resolution Was the resolution effective? Could it have been faster? Prevention What could prevent recurrence? Learning What can we learn from this incident? Major Problem Review Template Incident Summary Date and time Duration Severity Impact Timeline When events occurred Key decisions Communications Root Cause What caused the incident Contributing factors What Worked What went well What Could Have Been Better Areas for improvement Lessons Learned Key insights Action Items # Action Owner Due Date 1 Action Name Date Conclusion Major problem reviews are essential for learning from significant failures. By conducting thorough reviews, organizations can prevent recurrence, improve response, and build resilience. Action Items for Your Organization Establish a major problem review process Create a major problem review template Schedule reviews promptly after major incidents Assign action items with owners and due dates Share learnings across the organization