The Three Types of Change — Standard, Normal, and Emergency

The Three Types of Change — Standard, Normal, and Emergency

Headline: Not All Changes Are Created Equal — Why Categorization Is the Foundation of Change Enablement


The Three Types of ITIL Changes

To increase efficiency, ITIL defines three types of changes with different approval authorities and processes .

1. Standard Changes

Definition: Low risk, pre-authorized, well-understood changes that never cause an incident .

Characteristics:

  • Pre-authorized: Once certified, no further manual approvals needed
  • Well understood: Detailed work instructions, trained and certified personnel
  • Repeatable: Follow the same process each time
  • Low risk: Never cause an incident

Change Authority: Change Manager defines Standard change requirements. Once requirements are met, RFCs receive automatic change approval in the future .

Examples:

  • Regular software patches
  • Security updates
  • Password resets
  • Standard user access provisioning

Change Schedule: No 

2. Normal Changes

Definition: Changes that require thorough planning and execution and carry higher risk .

Characteristics:

  • Require risk assessment
  • Need approval before implementation
  • May require thorough planning
  • Should be scheduled

Change Authority: Change Advisory Board (CAB) with input from other practices 

Examples:

  • Major software upgrades
  • Infrastructure changes
  • New system implementations
  • Configuration changes with potential impact

Change Schedule: Yes 

3. Emergency Changes

Definition: Changes that must be implemented as soon as possible to resolve an incident .

Characteristics:

  • Urgent: Must be implemented immediately
  • Incident-driven: Necessitated by an incident
  • Expedited approval: Follow an expedited approval process

Change Authority: Emergency Change Advisory Board (ECAB) 

Examples:

  • Critical security patches
  • Immediate fixes for service outages
  • Emergency workarounds

Change Schedule: No 

Moving from Normal to Standard

As change success patterns emerge, organizations should move Normal changes to Standard status. This reduces approval overhead and accelerates delivery.

Criteria for standardizing:

  • Proven success (no incidents from implementation)
  • Repeatable process
  • Well-documented work instructions
  • Trained and certified personnel

Conclusion

Categorizing changes appropriately is the foundation of effective change enablement. By matching change types to the right approval process, organizations balance speed and risk—enabling faster, safer changes.


Action Items for Your Organization

  • Review your change classification criteria
  • Identify Normal changes that could become Standard
  • Document Standard change procedures
  • Establish Emergency change procedures
  • Train your team on change types